AWSHealthcareAI and Machine LearningData PlatformGenerative AI / LLMCost ReductionProductivity ImprovementSpeed to Market2024AWSAWS#ff9900HealthcareUnited KingdomExscientia wanted to shrink the time, cost, and failure rate of drug discovery, where conventional methods can take up to 15 years, cost over 2 billion dollars, and still fail 90–96 percent of the time.Conventional drug discovery methods can take up to 15 years and cost over 2 billion dollars, with an average…Jul 1, 20246AWS microservices02024-07-016
Exscientia wanted to shrink the time, cost, and failure rate of drug discovery, where conventional methods can take up to 15 years, cost over 2 billion dollars, and still fail 90–96 percent of the time.
↗Conventional drug discovery methods can take up to 15 years and cost over 2 billion dollars, with an average failure rate of 90–96 percent.
↗Exscientia has accelerated drug design by up to 70 percent while decreasing capital cost by 80 percent, compared with industry benchmarks.
↗Six molecules that Exscientia designed using AI have entered clinical trials.
↗Using this synthesis-aware, iterative approach built on AWS, Exscientia makes 10 times fewer compounds than the industry average.
Reported impact
Business outcome
Exscientia makes 10 times fewer compounds than the industry average, has accelerated drug design by up to 70 percent, decreased capital cost by 80 percent, and has already advanced six AI-designed molecules into clinical trials.
Cost Reduction
Productivity Improvement
Speed to Market
Solution
Exscientia built a design-make-test-learn platform on AWS that combines generative AI, active learning, and robotic lab automation to accelerate drug discovery. The company starts with target product profiles, then uses algorithms trained on public pharmacology data plus proprietary patient tissue samples, genomics, single-cell transcriptomics, and medical literature to generate candidate compounds in the cloud. Active learning narrows those candidates to the most promising molecules, and automated robots synthesize and test them in a lab orchestrated by AWS microservices. The resulting experimental data feeds back into future DMTL cycles so Exscientia can improve predictions, reduce the number of compounds it has to make, and move candidates to the clinic faster.
Data flow
Public pharmacology data, patient tissue samples, genomics, single-cell transcriptomics, and medical literature train Exscientia’s generative models; active learning narrows the candidate list, robots synthesize and test compounds, and the resulting data feeds future design-make-test-learn cycles.
Solution architecture
1 components · 1 layer
Orchestration
AWS microservicesOrchestrate the automated robotic lab that closes the design-make-test-learn loop.
Architecture clues
Built on Amazon Web Services (AWS), Exscientia’s innovative DMTL solution incorporates in silico design and automated robots that make drug candidates in a lab.
Data generated in the lab improves algorithmic predictions and speeds up DMTL cycles.
Its lab—orchestrated by AWS microservices—can operate 24/7 with minimal human supervision.
Evidence from the source
Built on Amazon Web Services (AWS), Exscientia’s innovative DMTL solution incorporates in silico design—using generative AI algorithms to design compounds in the cloud—and automated robots that make drug candidates in a lab.
Exscientia has accelerated drug design by up to 70 percent while decreasing capital cost by 80 percent, compared with industry benchmarks.
Six molecules that Exscientia designed using AI have entered clinical trials.
Thus, its lab—orchestrated by AWS microservices—can operate 24/7 with minimal human supervision.
Using this synthesis-aware, iterative approach built on AWS, Exscientia makes 10 times fewer compounds than the industry average.
Review how this reference was scored and trace each normalized claim back to its documented source.
01
Scoring methodology
How scores are calculated
Customer Reference Value measures usefulness as a customer reference. Evidence Confidence measures the quality and traceability of available evidence, not independent verification.
Customer reference value85/100
Problem clarity20/20
Measures whether the customer's operational problem is specific enough to compare.
Implementation depth20/25
Rewards named components, data flow, integrations, and architecture detail.
Outcome specificity20/20
Measures whether the reported benefit is concrete rather than a generic claim.
Quantified impact25/25
2 metrics describe measurable impact.
Deployment scale0/10
Rewards evidence of a live or scaled deployment and meaningful integration scope.
Evidence confidence87%
Source authority20/25
The main evidence is an official vendor-published customer story.
Claim traceability21/25
10 of 12 key fields link to a named source.
Direct evidence20/20
5 direct source quotes retained.
Date provenance8/10
The publication date comes from publisher-controlled metadata.
With your OK, we use Google Analytics cookies to see which pages and searches are useful. No ads, no profiling, and
nothing is loaded until you accept. You can change this any time under “Cookie settings” in the footer.