In-house Healthcare global Company newsroom

Novartis

Document Processing · Real-time Analytics · Risk Management

Novartis R&D needs to turn large volumes of scientific, clinical, operational, and real-world data into faster, higher-quality decisions across drug discovery and development, reducing cycle times, surfacing safety risks earlier, and improving trial planning in a domain where success rates are low and delays are costly.

less than 10 percent of drug candidates historically reach the market

Reported impact

Business outcome

Novartis aims to reduce drug discovery and development timelines, improve decision quality, surface risks earlier, shorten iterative cycles, and help teams bring therapies to patients faster with a higher likelihood of success.

  • Productivity Improvement
  • Risk Reduction
  • Speed to Market

Solution

Novartis describes an in-house, AI-enabled R&D decision-support approach that spans research, preclinical work, clinical development, and documentation. Data is ingested from human genetic and multi-omic datasets, imaging, clinical trial results, decades of published research, real-world evidence, protein information, prior chemistry, and clinical and operational study data. AI models are used to integrate these sources for target identification and validation, while generative chemistry methods explore molecular design spaces and optimize multiple properties in parallel. In development, Generative AI paired with knowledge graphs summarizes prior studies and evidence to support protocol drafting, and trial computational twins simulate what-if clinical design scenarios. AI-enhanced analytics monitor supply, recruitment, and study risks and recommend next best actions. The article does not name a storage platform, but it does describe approved-source workflows, privacy and quality controls, and expert human review before outputs are used in regulated R&D decisions.

Data flow

Novartis feeds genetic, multi-omic, imaging, trial, literature, real-world, protein, chemistry, clinical, and operational data into AI models and analytics. Those models generate target insights, molecule proposals, safety signals, protocol summaries, trial simulations, and study-risk recommendations, which are then reviewed by Novartis scientists and clinicians to guide R&D, trial design, and regulatory documentation.

Solution architecture

5 components · 2 layers
  1. Compute
    • AI models Integrate genetic, multi-omic, imaging, clinical, and literature evidence to identify and validate drug targets.
    • Generative AI Summarizes prior studies and evidence for trial design and creates structured first drafts of clinical and regulatory documentation.
    • trial computational twins Simulate the operational implications of clinical design choices so teams can test what-if scenarios faster.
    • AI-enhanced analytics Surface early risk signals across supply, monitoring, and recruitment and recommend next best actions to keep studies on track.
  2. Storage
    • knowledge graphs Provide structured context alongside Generative AI to summarize what has and has not worked across prior studies and real-world evidence.

Architecture clues

  • Documentation outputs are generated from approved sources and then reviewed and refined by Novartis experts.
  • Novartis combines internal tool development with external AI collaborations when off-the-shelf tools are insufficient for regulated science.
  • Privacy, safety, and quality controls are embedded throughout the workflow.
  • The approach is designed to be reused across therapeutic areas, teams, and geographies.

Evidence from the source

"AI models can integrate evidence from human genetic and multi-omic datasets, imaging, clinical trial results, and decades of published research to surface previously underappreciated disease drivers"
"AI-enabled tools such as Generative AI, paired with knowledge graphs, can rapidly summarize what has worked—and what hasn’t—across prior studies and real-world evidence"
"Generative AI can create well-structured first drafts using approved sources, which Novartis experts then review and refine"
"Novartis R&D is harnessing digital technologies to make smart decisions faster, aiming to reduce the time it takes to bring new options to patients"
"Novartis teams are using advanced, AI-enhanced analytics to surface early risk signals across supply, monitoring, and recruitment, and to recommend ‘next best actions’ when risks are identified"
"Simulations using trial computational twins can also help predict the operational implications of clinical design elements"
"With generative approaches, teams can propose new structures informed by protein information and prior chemistry, explore large, molecular-design spaces digitally, and optimize for multiple chemical properties in parallel"
Transparency Evidence & methodology 70/100 reference value · 92% confidence · 1 source

Review how this reference was scored and trace each normalized claim back to its documented source.

01

Scoring methodology

How scores are calculated

Customer Reference Value measures usefulness as a customer reference. Evidence Confidence measures the quality and traceability of available evidence, not independent verification.

Customer reference value70/100
  • Problem clarity20/20
    Measures whether the customer's operational problem is specific enough to compare.
  • Implementation depth25/25
    Rewards named components, data flow, integrations, and architecture detail.
  • Outcome specificity20/20
    Measures whether the reported benefit is concrete rather than a generic claim.
  • Quantified impact0/25
    0 metrics describe measurable impact.
  • Deployment scale5/10
    Rewards evidence of a live or scaled deployment and meaningful integration scope.
Evidence confidence92%
  • Source authority25/25
    The deployment is described by the adopting organization or a government source.
  • Claim traceability21/25
    10 of 12 key fields link to a named source.
  • Direct evidence20/20
    7 direct source quotes retained.
  • Date provenance10/10
    The publication date comes from the source page or publisher.
  • Source transparency8/10
    1 source reference document publisher, URL, authority, retrieval, and supported fields.
  • Implementation specificity8/10
    Rewards source-backed components, data flow, quantified impact, and a specific outcome.
02

Traceability

Sources & provenance

Field coverage shows which facts each source supports. Dates are shown only when documented by the source.

  1. Novartis

    Novartis customer story

    First-party
    https://www.novartis.com/stories/smarter-decisions-scale-how-novartis-using-ai-advance-rd
    Source type
    Customer-published story
    Published
    Jul 28, 2026
    Supports
    • Customer
    • Business problem
    • Solution
    • Products
    • Solution components
    • Data flow
    • Integrations
    • technical area
    • use case category
    • Business outcome
    • outcome category
    • Metrics
    • Architecture
    • evidence quotes
    • Publication date

Date evidence

  • Published on source page Jul 28, 2026 · Novartis · First-party
    Open date source
Not separately sourced Industry, Region, Company size. Treat these normalized attributes as lower-confidence until a dedicated source is added.