Use Case Intelligence RSS Search use cases Search
Microsoft Automotive United States

General Motors

Application Refactoring · IT Operations Automation

GM needed to get developers productive on new assignments faster while keeping its engineering environment agile, policy-compliant, and secure across multiple projects.

Read the original story Explore all use cases
About 400 GM developers have been using GitHub Copilot since February of 2023, and the response has been very positive.
“Often GitHub Copilot gets them 98% of the way there, and they only need to make small changes to finish it up.”

Reported impact

Business outcome

Together, GitHub Copilot and GitHub Advanced Security enhance productivity in a secure environment and get new developers to their first pulls faster.

  • Productivity Improvement
  • Risk Reduction
  • Speed to Market

Solution

GM moved developer setup and project environments onto Microsoft's cloud developer stack so engineers can start work immediately without waiting on manual workstation setup. Microsoft Dev Box provides preconfigured cloud workstations with the tools, databases, and security settings each project needs, while Azure Deployment Environments spins up standardized services and test environments from self-service templates. GM combines those services with GitHub Copilot and GitHub Advanced Security so developers can write code faster, publish applications remotely, and keep changes inside a zero-trust model with real-time vulnerability analysis. The result is a code-to-cloud workflow that reduces onboarding friction while preserving project-level isolation, compliance, and rapid delivery.

Data flow

Developers start from a preconfigured Dev Box image, provision app services through Azure Deployment Environments, and publish code through GitHub-backed workflows where security checks run at check-in time.

Solution architecture

4 components · 3 layers
  1. Serving
    • Microsoft Dev Box Provides preconfigured cloud development workstations so engineers can start new projects quickly.
    • GitHub Copilot Suggests code and helps developers contribute faster inside their existing engineering workflow.
  2. Orchestration
    • Azure Deployment Environments Automates creation of standardized application environments and services from self-service templates.
  3. Governance
    • GitHub Advanced Security Scans code for vulnerabilities at check-in so teams keep developer speed without dropping security controls.

Architecture clues

  • Azure Deployment Environments helps GM quickly spin up the services an app needs to run using standardized, self-service templates built for projects.
  • GitHub Advanced Security analyzes code in real-time and alerts developers to vulnerabilities at the moment they check in changes, while GitHub Copilot speeds contribution on new work.
  • Microsoft Dev Box centrally manages cloud-based development workstations that are preconfigured and ready-to-code with all the tools and security settings already provisioned for the developers’ needs.
  • The solution to GM’s need for agile setup and administration of developer environments was to move these operations to the Azure cloud.

Evidence from the source

A key example is Azure Deployment Environments, which GM uses to quickly spin up the services their app needs to run using standardized, self-service templates built for their projects.
Since July 2022, GM has used Microsoft Dev Box ... to centrally manage cloud-based development workstations that are preconfigured and ready-to-code with all the tools and security settings already provisioned for the developers’ needs.
To increase productivity and unlock new ideas and solutions, GM felt the challenge of getting developers up to speed on new assignments faster and more efficiently.
Together, GitHub Copilot and GitHub Advanced Security enhance productivity in a secure environment and get new devs to their first pulls faster.
Transparency Evidence & methodology 90/100 reference value · 89% confidence · 1 source

Review how this reference was scored and trace each normalized claim back to its documented source.

01

Scoring methodology

How scores are calculated

Customer Reference Value measures usefulness as a customer reference. Evidence Confidence measures the quality and traceability of available evidence, not independent verification.

Customer reference value90/100
  • Problem clarity20/20
    Measures whether the customer's operational problem is specific enough to compare.
  • Implementation depth25/25
    Rewards named components, data flow, integrations, and architecture detail.
  • Outcome specificity20/20
    Measures whether the reported benefit is concrete rather than a generic claim.
  • Quantified impact15/25
    1 metric describe measurable impact.
  • Deployment scale10/10
    Rewards evidence of a live or scaled deployment and meaningful integration scope.
Evidence confidence89%
  • Source authority20/25
    The main evidence is an official vendor-published customer story.
  • Claim traceability21/25
    10 of 12 key fields link to a named source.
  • Direct evidence20/20
    4 direct source quotes retained.
  • Date provenance10/10
    The publication date comes from the source page or publisher.
  • Source transparency8/10
    1 source reference document publisher, URL, authority, retrieval, and supported fields.
  • Implementation specificity10/10
    Rewards source-backed components, data flow, quantified impact, and a specific outcome.
02

Traceability

Sources & provenance

Field coverage shows which facts each source supports. Dates are shown only when documented by the source.

  1. Microsoft

    General Motors customer story

    First-party
    https://www.microsoft.com/en/customers/story/1650265213028177234-gm-cloud-based-developer-services-from-microsoft
    Source type
    Vendor-published customer story
    Published
    Jun 27, 2023
    Supports
    • Customer
    • Business problem
    • Solution
    • Products
    • Solution components
    • Data flow
    • Integrations
    • technical area
    • use case category
    • Business outcome
    • outcome category
    • Metrics
    • Architecture
    • evidence quotes
    • Publication date

Date evidence

  • Published on source page Jun 27, 2023 · Microsoft · First-party
    Open date source
Not separately sourced Industry, Region, Company size. Treat these normalized attributes as lower-confidence until a dedicated source is added.

Related

Similar use cases

See all like this
OpenAI May 12, 2026 AutoScout24 Group Automotive Europe & UK, North America AutoScout24 Group needed to deliver product changes faster across growing engineering, data, and product complexity without compromising reliability for buyers, dealers, and customer-facing vehicle marketplaces. Reduced development timelines from 2–3 weeks to 2–3 days for select projects Application RefactoringIT Operations Automation ChatGPT · Codex Alibaba Cloud May 14, 2025 NIO Automotive China NIO wanted to raise software-engineering speed for smart-cockpit work without giving up code quality or security. The team needed help with repetitive coding, interface lookup, testing, and bug prevention, but it also… AI-generated code contributes 30% to 40% of day-to-day development output Application RefactoringIT Operations Automation Qoder CN Microsoft Nov 18, 2025 Ford Motor Company Automotive Global Ford's nearly 170,000 employees worked across multiple fragmented collaboration platforms—developers in one tool, business teams in another, meetings in a third—creating communication silos, slowing productivity, and… Nearly 170,000 employees unified on Microsoft Teams IT Operations AutomationSystem Migration Microsoft 365 · Microsoft Teams · Microsoft Teams Premium