AWS Software / SaaS United States

EagleView

As its ML demands grew, EagleView encountered challenges with large workloads where the system had to handle thousands of requests at once. So, it sought a high-performance ML solution that could help manage its large pipelines for image data extraction.

300–400%
40–50%
In 2021, the EagleView team started exploring using Amazon SageMaker and building a proof of concept.
The company migrated its two pipelines over to Amazon SageMaker within 8 months.

Reported impact

Business outcome

The successful migration to Amazon SageMaker is the first step of the journey for EagleView to realize the full potential of the AWS suite of ML solutions. The team plans to catalog their model artifacts in a model registry and begin using tools like Amazon SageMaker Studio for end-to-end ML development. Key reported metrics include improvement in model performance 300–400%; 300–400%; reduction in compute costs 40–50%.

  • Cost Reduction
  • Speed to Market

Solution

Learn how EagleView in the software industry optimized the performance of its data extraction models using Amazon SageMaker. EagleView needed a solution to handle its increasingly complex machine learning (ML) needs. So, it turned to Amazon Web Services (AWS) for a scalable solution that could improve system performance and reduce costs. EagleView migrated its data pipelines to Amazon SageMaker —where teams can build, train, and deploy ML models for any use case with fully managed infrastructure, tools, and workflows. As a result, it improved model performance by 300–400 percent, reduced compute costs by 40–50 percent, reduced processing time, met its customer service-level agreements (SLA) consistently, and improved overall system reliability. In 2021, the EagleView team started exploring using Amazon SageMaker and building a proof of concept.

Data flow

Source data enters the EagleView workflow through its application services, processed with Amazon SageMaker, Amazon EKS, and delivered through Amazon SageMaker Asynchronous Inference.

Solution architecture

3 components · 2 layers
  1. Compute
    • Amazon SageMaker Supports model training, fine-tuning, evaluation, or managed inference for the customer workload.
    • Amazon EKS Runs containerized workloads and Kubernetes-based application services.
  2. Serving
    • Amazon SageMaker Asynchronous Inference Handles long-running inference jobs outside synchronous request paths.

Architecture clues

  • EagleView migrated its data pipelines to Amazon SageMaker —where teams can build, train, and deploy ML models for any use case with fully managed infrastructure, tools, and workflows.
  • Now, millions of images can be processed on EagleView’s large batch processing pipeline through Amazon SageMaker Inference.
  • The company migrated its two pipelines over to Amazon SageMaker within 8 months.
  • We have developed a mature ML program to deliver high performance for all our pipelines.
  • “Since we don’t have to spend time optimizing, we can operationalize our next pipeline and support larger workloads.” By using near real-time inference endpoints on Amazon SageMaker, EagleView improved its model performa
  • “We have developed a mature ML program to deliver high performance for all our pipelines.” Using Amazon SageMaker has opened the door to create a complete environment where everything is under one suite of products.

Evidence from the source

300–400%
40–50%
As its ML demands grew, EagleView encountered challenges with large workloads where the system had to handle thousands of requests at once. So, it sought a high-performance ML solution that could help manage its large pipelines for image da
In 2021, the EagleView team started exploring using Amazon SageMaker and building a proof of concept.
The company migrated its two pipelines over to Amazon SageMaker within 8 months.
The successful migration to Amazon SageMaker is the first step of the journey for EagleView to realize the full potential of the AWS suite of ML solutions.
Transparency Evidence & methodology 90/100 reference value · 90% confidence · 2 sources

Review how this reference was scored and trace each normalized claim back to its documented source.

01

Scoring methodology

How scores are calculated

Customer Reference Value measures usefulness as a customer reference. Evidence Confidence measures the quality and traceability of available evidence, not independent verification.

Customer reference value90/100
  • Problem clarity20/20
    Measures whether the customer's operational problem is specific enough to compare.
  • Implementation depth20/25
    Rewards named components, data flow, integrations, and architecture detail.
  • Outcome specificity20/20
    Measures whether the reported benefit is concrete rather than a generic claim.
  • Quantified impact25/25
    6 metrics describe measurable impact.
  • Deployment scale5/10
    Rewards evidence of a live or scaled deployment and meaningful integration scope.
Evidence confidence90%
  • Source authority20/25
    The main evidence is an official vendor-published customer story.
  • Claim traceability23/25
    11 of 12 key fields link to a named source.
  • Direct evidence20/20
    6 direct source quotes retained.
  • Date provenance8/10
    The publication date comes from publisher-controlled metadata.
  • Source transparency9/10
    2 source references document publisher, URL, authority, retrieval, and supported fields.
  • Implementation specificity10/10
    Rewards source-backed components, data flow, quantified impact, and a specific outcome.
02

Traceability

Sources & provenance

Field coverage shows which facts each source supports. Dates are shown only when documented by the source.

  1. AWS

    EagleView customer story

    First-party
    https://aws.amazon.com/solutions/case-studies/eagleview-case-study/
    Source type
    Vendor-published customer story
    Published
    Jun 19, 2024
    Supports
    • Customer
    • Business problem
    • Solution
    • Products
    • Solution components
    • Data flow
    • Integrations
    • technical area
    • use case category
    • Business outcome
    • outcome category
    • Metrics
    • Architecture
    • evidence quotes
    • Publication date
  2. EagleView

    Contact Us

    First-party
    https://www.eagleview.com/contact-us/

    Corporate Headquarters Rochester, NY 14623

    Source type
    Official company website
    Supports
    • Region

Date evidence

Not separately sourced Industry, Company size. Treat these normalized attributes as lower-confidence until a dedicated source is added.