In-house Healthcare United States Company newsroom

Elevance Health

Document Processing · Fraud Detection

Elevance Health needed to find fraud, waste, and abuse in very large volumes of claims, payment, contract, and medical-record data so it could detect billing errors, suspicious coding patterns, and improper payments earlier while controlling healthcare costs and protecting program integrity.

across an annualized volume of nearly 23,000 reviews
from an average of 40 minutes to 20 minutes

Reported impact

Business outcome

Elevance Health says AI helps investigators identify issues earlier in the claims process, speeds audits and medical-record review, improves the efficiency of fraud, waste, and abuse investigations, and supports cost control and healthcare program integrity.

  • Cost Reduction
  • Productivity Improvement
  • Risk Reduction

Solution

Elevance Health describes an in-house AI-assisted payment integrity workflow that combines predictive AI, AI-driven lead identification, and human review inside Carelon’s Payment Integrity operation. The process starts with claims and payment data, which models analyze to determine whether services were billed and paid appropriately and to surface unusual coding or charging patterns relative to peers or local norms. Supporting AI-powered programs also summarize thousands of pages of medical records and align formatting across care provider contract data and medical claims so auditors can review suspected irregularities faster. The outputs are not used autonomously: investigators, auditors, and the Special Investigations Unit review flagged leads, interpret whether anomalies stem from mistakes, contract differences, regulations, or intentional upcoding, and then decide on education, recovery, termination, or other follow-up actions.

Data flow

Claims and payment data are analyzed by predictive AI models to flag unusual billing patterns, while AI-powered programs process medical records and normalize care provider contract and claims formats. These outputs flow to Payment Integrity investigators, auditors, and the Special Investigations Unit, who review the evidence, determine whether fraud, waste, or abuse is occurring, and take follow-up action.

Solution architecture

0 products mentioned

Architecture clues

  • AI is applied to both structured claims/payment data and unstructured medical-record documents.
  • Follow-up actions can include provider education, payment recovery efforts, contract termination recommendations, or other actions.
  • Human investigators review AI-generated leads before deciding whether anomalies reflect mistakes, contract or regulatory differences, or intentional upcoding.
  • The workflow is operated within Carelon's Payment Integrity division.

Evidence from the source

"AI gives us the ability to see patterns humans might not on their own, but it’s our people who bring context and clarity."
"Increasingly, this work pairs the human expertise of Elevance Health associates ... with AI-driven lead identification or predictive AI."
"The process often begins with models that analyze claims and payment data to ensure services have been billed and paid for appropriately."
"These programs can summarize thousands of pages of medical records, for example, or align formatting for care provider contract data and medical claims to support any required human review of irregular payment patterns."
"Within a clinical auditing unit in Carelon’s Payment Integrity division, for example, one program has helped cut associates’ medical record review time in half — from an average of 40 minutes to 20 minutes — across an annualized volume of nearly 23,000 reviews."
Transparency Evidence & methodology 75/100 reference value · 90% confidence · 1 source

Review how this reference was scored and trace each normalized claim back to its documented source.

01

Scoring methodology

How scores are calculated

Customer Reference Value measures usefulness as a customer reference. Evidence Confidence measures the quality and traceability of available evidence, not independent verification.

Customer reference value75/100
  • Problem clarity20/20
    Measures whether the customer's operational problem is specific enough to compare.
  • Implementation depth15/25
    Rewards named components, data flow, integrations, and architecture detail.
  • Outcome specificity20/20
    Measures whether the reported benefit is concrete rather than a generic claim.
  • Quantified impact15/25
    1 metric describe measurable impact.
  • Deployment scale5/10
    Rewards evidence of a live or scaled deployment and meaningful integration scope.
Evidence confidence90%
  • Source authority25/25
    The deployment is described by the adopting organization or a government source.
  • Claim traceability21/25
    10 of 12 key fields link to a named source.
  • Direct evidence20/20
    5 direct source quotes retained.
  • Date provenance10/10
    The publication date comes from the source page or publisher.
  • Source transparency8/10
    1 source reference document publisher, URL, authority, retrieval, and supported fields.
  • Implementation specificity6/10
    Rewards source-backed components, data flow, quantified impact, and a specific outcome.
02

Traceability

Sources & provenance

Field coverage shows which facts each source supports. Dates are shown only when documented by the source.

  1. Elevance Health

    Elevance Health customer story

    First-party
    https://www.elevancehealth.com/our-approach-to-health/digitally-enabled-healthcare/how-ai-helps-fight-fraud-waste-and-abuse
    Source type
    Customer-published story
    Published
    Apr 13, 2026
    Supports
    • Customer
    • Business problem
    • Solution
    • Products
    • Solution components
    • Data flow
    • Integrations
    • technical area
    • use case category
    • Business outcome
    • outcome category
    • Metrics
    • Architecture
    • evidence quotes
    • Publication date

Date evidence

  • Published on source page Apr 13, 2026 · Elevance Health · First-party
    Open date source
Not separately sourced Industry, Region, Company size. Treat these normalized attributes as lower-confidence until a dedicated source is added.