In-house Financial Services Switzerland Company newsroom

Generali Switzerland

Document Processing

Claim handlers were managing dozens of cases each day while manually navigating documents, guidelines, and deadlines, which slowed claims processing and left less time for higher-value decision-making.

50 claims of varying complexity
dozens of cases daily

Reported impact

Business outcome

The proof of concept showed measurable gains in productivity and process automation, and the solution is now moving into production to improve efficiency, accuracy, and decision-making in claims handling while creating a reusable AI blueprint for wider Generali deployment.

  • Productivity Improvement
  • Risk Reduction
  • Scalability

Solution

Generali Switzerland, working with Group Data, AI & Automation (DAIA) and the House of Insurtech Switzerland (HITS), built KAssis as an internally developed GenAI knowledge assistant for insurance claims handling. The implementation is designed around the material claim handlers already use in daily work: claims documents, internal guidelines, and deadline-related information. KAssis uses that content to help staff find information quickly, extract key data from case material, flag inconsistencies, and suggest possible settlement options during claim review. The assistant is being hardened from a proof of concept into a production-ready deployment for Switzerland, with collaboration from frontline claim handlers and compliance with Generali data-security standards. The source does not name external models, storage services, or APIs, but it does position KAssis as a reusable, scalable in-house AI capability intended first for Non-Life teams in Switzerland and later for broader Group reuse.

Data flow

Claims documents, guidelines, and deadline-related case information are used by KAssis to support claim handlers. The assistant surfaces relevant information, extracts key data, identifies inconsistencies, and proposes settlement options, after which handlers use those outputs to make faster and more informed claim decisions.

Solution architecture

1 components · 1 layer
  1. Serving
    • KAssis An in-house GenAI knowledge assistant that helps claim handlers search case information, extract key data, flag inconsistencies, and suggest settlement options.

Architecture clues

  • Built to comply with Generali standards for data security.
  • Developed internally by Generali Switzerland with DAIA and HITS rather than using off-the-shelf external AI tools.
  • Initial rollout targets Non-Life teams in Switzerland.
  • Intended as a reusable Group-level AI capability and blueprint for other Generali business units.
  • Moving from proof of concept into a production-ready deployment in Switzerland.

Evidence from the source

"At the beginning of the year, the project team conducted a Proof of Concept (PoC) analyzing 50 claims of varying complexity."
"Claim handlers manage dozens of cases daily, navigating a maze of documents, guidelines, and deadlines. Much of this work remains manual"
"KAssis aims to change that by acting as an intelligent assistant, helping handlers find information quickly extract key data flag inconsistencies and proactively suggest possible settlement options"
"KAssis, an in-house GenAI-powered knowledge assistant designed to transform the way claim handlers work."
"The results were promising, demonstrating measurable gains in productivity and process automation."
"developed internally, in close collaboration with the claim handlers and ensuring compliance with Generali’s standards for data security."
Transparency Evidence & methodology 65/100 reference value · 92% confidence · 1 source

Review how this reference was scored and trace each normalized claim back to its documented source.

01

Scoring methodology

How scores are calculated

Customer Reference Value measures usefulness as a customer reference. Evidence Confidence measures the quality and traceability of available evidence, not independent verification.

Customer reference value65/100
  • Problem clarity20/20
    Measures whether the customer's operational problem is specific enough to compare.
  • Implementation depth20/25
    Rewards named components, data flow, integrations, and architecture detail.
  • Outcome specificity20/20
    Measures whether the reported benefit is concrete rather than a generic claim.
  • Quantified impact0/25
    0 metrics describe measurable impact.
  • Deployment scale5/10
    Rewards evidence of a live or scaled deployment and meaningful integration scope.
Evidence confidence92%
  • Source authority25/25
    The deployment is described by the adopting organization or a government source.
  • Claim traceability21/25
    10 of 12 key fields link to a named source.
  • Direct evidence20/20
    6 direct source quotes retained.
  • Date provenance10/10
    The publication date comes from the source page or publisher.
  • Source transparency8/10
    1 source reference document publisher, URL, authority, retrieval, and supported fields.
  • Implementation specificity8/10
    Rewards source-backed components, data flow, quantified impact, and a specific outcome.
02

Traceability

Sources & provenance

Field coverage shows which facts each source supports. Dates are shown only when documented by the source.

  1. Generali Switzerland

    Generali Switzerland customer story

    First-party
    https://www.generali.com/info/discovering-generali/all/2025/KAssis-Generali-s-in-house-GenAI-knowledge-assistant-moves-from-concept-to-reality
    Source type
    Customer-published story
    Published
    Oct 16, 2025
    Supports
    • Customer
    • Business problem
    • Solution
    • Products
    • Solution components
    • Data flow
    • Integrations
    • technical area
    • use case category
    • Business outcome
    • outcome category
    • Metrics
    • Architecture
    • evidence quotes
    • Publication date

Date evidence

  • Published on source page Oct 16, 2025 · Generali Group · First-party
    Open date source
Not separately sourced Industry, Region, Company size. Treat these normalized attributes as lower-confidence until a dedicated source is added.