In-house Public Sector United States Company newsroom

United States Navy

Predictive Maintenance · Risk Management

The U.S. Navy needs to process very large volumes of combat-system data quickly enough to improve situational awareness, detect and identify emerging threats, and reduce operator reaction time, including against hypersonic threats.

Reported impact

Business outcome

The AI-enhanced Aegis implementation is intended to improve situational awareness, operator decision making, and reaction time; improve detection, tracking, and identification of emerging threats; maximize uptime through predictive maintenance; and reduce cost while delivering new capability builds faster.

  • Cost Reduction
  • Productivity Improvement
  • Risk Reduction
  • Speed to Market

Solution

Lockheed Martin describes an in-house AI and machine learning implementation inside the Aegis environment for the U.S. Navy. Naval radars generate high volumes of electronic-signature and other operational data that feed the Aegis Fire Control system, where AI methods and AI algorithms are used to autonomously recognize patterns subtler than conventional software decision aids can detect. Those results are surfaced through the broader Aegis Combat System to improve situational awareness, operator decision support, and reaction time against fast-moving threats, including hypersonic targets. The company also applies AI across Aegis lifecycles, using operational and engineering data for predictive maintenance and pairing AI with model-based engineering processes to identify hardware and software issues earlier, reduce cost, and deliver new capability builds faster. Lockheed Martin says deployment is controlled through design, test, and review artifacts aligned to Department of Defense AI Ethical Principles and reviewed with customer stakeholders before release.

Data flow

Sensor and electronic-signature data from naval radars flows into the Aegis Fire Control system, where AI methods analyze patterns in the data to improve detection, tracking, and identification of threats. The outputs are then presented through the Aegis Combat System to support operators and commanders, while additional operational and engineering data is used for predictive maintenance and earlier hardware/software issue identification.

Solution architecture

3 components · 3 layers
  1. Ingest
    • Naval radars Generate the sensor and electronic-signature data that AI methods analyze for threat detection.
  2. Compute
    • Aegis Fire Control system Processes complex combat data and applies AI methods to detect, track, and identify emerging threats.
  3. Serving
    • Aegis Combat System Delivers AI-enabled situational awareness and decision support to operators and commanders across Aegis lifecycles.

Architecture clues

  • AI is being developed and fielded across Aegis Combat System lifecycles from the factory to the fleet.
  • The Aegis Combat System is described as combining over 50 years of continuous evolution.
  • The ethical and deployment process is aligned to the five Department of Defense AI Ethical Principles: Responsible, Equitable, Traceable, Reliable and Governable.
  • The system is described as needing to defend against hypersonic threats flying more than five times the speed of sound.
  • The team includes hundreds of AI and Machine Learning engineers.

Evidence from the source

"Aegis uses AI to provide critical mission-focused capability improvements in situational awareness, operator decision making and reduced reaction time."
"Lockheed Martin is developing and fielding AI technologies with speed and agility across Aegis Combat System lifecycles to deliver a superior solution and tactical advantage to the fleet."
"Lockheed Martin is using AI methods to enhance our Naval radars by identifying patterns in various types of data, dramatically improving the ability to detect, track and identify emerging threats based on the electronic signatures present in the data."
"Outside the combat system, AI can help Aegis predictively determine when parts will need maintenance before they break, thereby maximizing uptime."
"We’ve made tremendous progress in providing system enhancements, such as the ability to autonomously recognize patterns that are more subtle than a human with conventional software decision aids could discern."
"When applied with our model-based engineering processes, AI helps us identify and fix hardware and software problems early – keeping cost down and allowing us to deliver new capability builds faster."
Transparency Evidence & methodology 70/100 reference value · 92% confidence · 1 source

Review how this reference was scored and trace each normalized claim back to its documented source.

01

Scoring methodology

How scores are calculated

Customer Reference Value measures usefulness as a customer reference. Evidence Confidence measures the quality and traceability of available evidence, not independent verification.

Customer reference value70/100
  • Problem clarity20/20
    Measures whether the customer's operational problem is specific enough to compare.
  • Implementation depth20/25
    Rewards named components, data flow, integrations, and architecture detail.
  • Outcome specificity20/20
    Measures whether the reported benefit is concrete rather than a generic claim.
  • Quantified impact0/25
    0 metrics describe measurable impact.
  • Deployment scale10/10
    Rewards evidence of a live or scaled deployment and meaningful integration scope.
Evidence confidence92%
  • Source authority25/25
    The deployment is described by the adopting organization or a government source.
  • Claim traceability21/25
    10 of 12 key fields link to a named source.
  • Direct evidence20/20
    6 direct source quotes retained.
  • Date provenance10/10
    The publication date comes from the source page or publisher.
  • Source transparency8/10
    1 source reference document publisher, URL, authority, retrieval, and supported fields.
  • Implementation specificity8/10
    Rewards source-backed components, data flow, quantified impact, and a specific outcome.
02

Traceability

Sources & provenance

Field coverage shows which facts each source supports. Dates are shown only when documented by the source.

  1. United States Navy

    United States Navy customer story

    First-party
    https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/news/features/2023/artificial-intelligence-and-aegis-the-future-is-here.html
    Source type
    Customer-published story
    Published
    Jan 10, 2023
    Supports
    • Customer
    • Business problem
    • Solution
    • Products
    • Solution components
    • Data flow
    • Integrations
    • technical area
    • use case category
    • Business outcome
    • outcome category
    • Metrics
    • Architecture
    • evidence quotes
    • Publication date

Date evidence

  • Published on source page Jan 10, 2023 · Lockheed Martin · First-party
    Open date source
Not separately sourced Industry, Region, Company size. Treat these normalized attributes as lower-confidence until a dedicated source is added.