Microsoft Travel and Hospitality Germany Company newsroom

unknown

Predictive Maintenance

The company needed to generate more accurate fixed-price aircraft maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) sales quotes by predicting likely defects, turnaround time, and required tools, assets, labor, and budget, because quotes that were too high could lose business while quotes that were too low could create major cost overruns.

Reported impact

Business outcome

The quotation application helps the company create more competitive and accurate proposals, improve the probability of winning contracts, and start new contracts with a better planning basis through more accurate predictions of aircraft defects and turnaround times.

  • Productivity Improvement
  • Revenue Growth
  • Risk Reduction

Solution

DXC and Luxoft worked with the German aircraft maintenance provider to prove whether AI could improve quotation accuracy for overhaul work. The implementation started as an MVP with KPIs to test whether prediction quality was high enough to support a business case. In the MVP, data from historic MRO events was combined with information from previous proposals and other internal sources and fed into an AI model that predicts the most probable real-world defects an aircraft will show during overhaul, along with the likely resource implications. The source also cites prior aircraft performance, maintenance events, and operating environment as relevant contextual inputs for better accuracy. After validation, DXC turned the MVP into a stable production solution by embedding the defect predictions into a specifically developed cloud-based sales quote application, which employees use to prepare proposals and plan new contracts, and which is serviced through the company's Microsoft Azure-based Aviator platform.

Data flow

Historic MRO event data, previous proposals, and other internal sources are combined and fed into an AI model that predicts probable overhaul defects and resource requirements. Those predictions are embedded into a cloud-based sales quote application, which employees access through the Microsoft Azure-based Aviator platform to prepare proposals and support planning for new contracts.

Solution architecture

3 components · 2 layers
  1. Compute
    • AI model Predicts the most probable real-world aircraft defects and related resource needs from combined MRO and proposal data.
  2. Serving
    • cloud-based sales quote application Presents defect predictions to employees so they can prepare proposals and plan contract execution.
    • Microsoft Azure-based Aviator platform Services the production quotation application used by employees.

Architecture clues

  • Defect predictions were embedded into a dedicated cloud-based quotation application.
  • The production application is serviced through a Microsoft Azure-based Aviator platform.
  • The solution was first delivered as an MVP with KPIs to validate prediction quality before production rollout.
  • The source describes previous aircraft performance, maintenance events, and operating environment as important predictive inputs.

Evidence from the source

“Aircraft maintenance services is a highly competitive field, and we needed a sales quote tool that would provide more accurate estimates.”
“Having more accurate predictions of aircraft defects and turnaround times is very valuable to our business.”
“In the MVP, data from historic MRO events was combined with information from previous proposals and other sources, then mingled into an AI model to come up with a prediction of the most probable real-world defects.”
“The defect predictions were embedded into a specifically developed cloud-based sales quote application, which is now being used by the company’s employees in the preparation of proposals and being serviced through its Microsoft Azure- based Aviator platform.”
“The goal was to see if AI models could be used to predict potential defects for the purposes of preparing sales quotes, in much the same way that AI is used for predictive maintenance.”
“This has allowed the company to present more competitive proposals to its customers and improve the probabilities of winning contracts.”
Transparency Evidence & methodology 75/100 reference value · 92% confidence · 1 source

Review how this reference was scored and trace each normalized claim back to its documented source.

01

Scoring methodology

How scores are calculated

Customer Reference Value measures usefulness as a customer reference. Evidence Confidence measures the quality and traceability of available evidence, not independent verification.

Customer reference value75/100
  • Problem clarity20/20
    Measures whether the customer's operational problem is specific enough to compare.
  • Implementation depth25/25
    Rewards named components, data flow, integrations, and architecture detail.
  • Outcome specificity20/20
    Measures whether the reported benefit is concrete rather than a generic claim.
  • Quantified impact0/25
    0 metrics describe measurable impact.
  • Deployment scale10/10
    Rewards evidence of a live or scaled deployment and meaningful integration scope.
Evidence confidence92%
  • Source authority25/25
    The deployment is described by the adopting organization or a government source.
  • Claim traceability21/25
    10 of 12 key fields link to a named source.
  • Direct evidence20/20
    6 direct source quotes retained.
  • Date provenance10/10
    The publication date comes from the source page or publisher.
  • Source transparency8/10
    1 source reference document publisher, URL, authority, retrieval, and supported fields.
  • Implementation specificity8/10
    Rewards source-backed components, data flow, quantified impact, and a specific outcome.
02

Traceability

Sources & provenance

Field coverage shows which facts each source supports. Dates are shown only when documented by the source.

  1. unknown

    unknown customer story

    First-party
    https://dxc.com/insights/customer-stories/leading-aircraft-maintenance-company-improves-accuracy-of-sales-quotes-and-mro-services-with-ai-solution
    Source type
    Customer-published story
    Published
    Apr 5, 2022
    Supports
    • Customer
    • Business problem
    • Solution
    • Products
    • Solution components
    • Data flow
    • Integrations
    • technical area
    • use case category
    • Business outcome
    • outcome category
    • Metrics
    • Architecture
    • evidence quotes
    • Publication date

Date evidence

  • Published on source page Apr 5, 2022 · DXC Technology · First-party
    Open date source
Not separately sourced Industry, Region, Company size. Treat these normalized attributes as lower-confidence until a dedicated source is added.