MongoDB Healthcare Global

Cyntegrity

Real-time Analytics · Risk Management

Cyntegrity needed a secure, globally available, cloud database that could combine clinical-trial data from multiple systems of record, preserve longitudinal context, satisfy data residency rules, and surface fraud and schedule risks quickly enough to improve trial quality and compliance.

A machine-learning estimate for one customer's biggest clinical trial proved accurate down to two weeks.
Cyntegrity estimates it needs just one individual to maintain its infrastructure instead of 20 people for an SQL database.
MongoDB flagged 99% duplication between outcomes from two medical centers in one failed study.
MyRBQM has 99.99% availability.

Reported impact

Business outcome

Cyntegrity achieved 10x faster performance and 99.99% availability, reduced the maintenance burden from a projected 20 people to one, helped clients detect fraud and quality issues before studies failed, and used machine learning to forecast trial durations with near-two-week accuracy.

  • Compliance
  • Productivity Improvement
  • Risk Reduction

Solution

Cyntegrity runs its MyRBQM portal on MongoDB Atlas on Microsoft Azure so pharmaceutical sponsors and regulators can analyze global clinical-trial data in one secure, always-on environment. Clinical trial records from multiple source systems are stored as flexible documents with role-based access, multi-tenancy, and timestamped audit trails, while MongoDB Time Series Collections preserve longitudinal measurements so the platform can compare changes over time, predict study duration, and flag duplicate or anomalous submissions. Atlas's managed multi-cluster setup and backup integration give the company cloud resilience across regions, and real-time updates allow multiple researchers to collaborate without version-control issues or peak-time latency. This architecture also supports machine-learning workloads that detect fraud, estimate timelines, and surface compliance issues fast enough for sponsors and regulators to intervene before studies fail or budgets drift.

Data flow

Clinical-trial records from customer systems flow into MongoDB Atlas on Azure, where timestamped observations are stored in time series collections, analyzed for anomalies and duplicate outcomes, and exposed in real time to researchers, sponsors, and regulators through the MyRBQM portal.

Solution architecture

3 components · 2 layers
  1. Storage
    • MongoDB Atlas Hosts the MyRBQM portal as a managed multi-tenant database for clinical-trial analytics and collaboration.
    • MongoDB Time Series Collections Preserves time-stamped clinical observations so users can run longitudinal analysis and detect anomalies over time.
  2. Orchestration
    • Microsoft Azure Provides the cloud environment Cyntegrity uses for resilient, region-aware Atlas deployments.

Architecture clues

  • MongoDB Atlas runs in a multi-cluster setup on Microsoft Azure with backup integration for resilience.
  • Multiple users collaborate on the portal simultaneously with real-time data updates and no version-control issues.
  • The platform uses multi-tenancy, role-based access, and timestamped audit trails for sensitive clinical data.
  • Time series collections preserve each data point with original context for longitudinal studies.

Evidence from the source

"Cyntegrity uses MongoDB Atlas on Azure for fast, scalable, and secure trial data management, enabling real-time insights, fraud detection, and accurate trial forecasting."
"Its portal has 99.99% availability and is so reliable that the company broadcasts its system status live on the website."
"To support longitudinal studies, MongoDB Time Series Collections ensure that every time-stamped customer data point is preserved with its original context."
"When they analyzed why it failed, MongoDB flagged 99% duplication between the outcomes from two medical centers."
Transparency Evidence & methodology 100/100 reference value · 79% confidence · 1 source

Review how this reference was scored and trace each normalized claim back to its documented source.

01

Scoring methodology

How scores are calculated

Customer Reference Value measures usefulness as a customer reference. Evidence Confidence measures the quality and traceability of available evidence, not independent verification.

Customer reference value100/100
  • Problem clarity20/20
    Measures whether the customer's operational problem is specific enough to compare.
  • Implementation depth25/25
    Rewards named components, data flow, integrations, and architecture detail.
  • Outcome specificity20/20
    Measures whether the reported benefit is concrete rather than a generic claim.
  • Quantified impact25/25
    3 metrics describe measurable impact.
  • Deployment scale10/10
    Rewards evidence of a live or scaled deployment and meaningful integration scope.
Evidence confidence79%
  • Source authority20/25
    The main evidence is an official vendor-published customer story.
  • Claim traceability21/25
    10 of 12 key fields link to a named source.
  • Direct evidence20/20
    4 direct source quotes retained.
  • Date provenance0/10
    The publication date has no documented provenance.
  • Source transparency8/10
    1 source reference document publisher, URL, authority, retrieval, and supported fields.
  • Implementation specificity10/10
    Rewards source-backed components, data flow, quantified impact, and a specific outcome.
02

Traceability

Sources & provenance

Field coverage shows which facts each source supports. Dates are shown only when documented by the source.

  1. MongoDB

    Cyntegrity customer story

    First-party
    https://www.mongodb.com/solutions/customer-case-studies/cyntegrity
    Source type
    Vendor-published customer story
    Supports
    • Customer
    • Business problem
    • Solution
    • Products
    • Solution components
    • Data flow
    • Integrations
    • technical area
    • use case category
    • Business outcome
    • outcome category
    • Metrics
    • Architecture
    • evidence quotes

Date evidence

  • First archived Nov 6, 2024 · Internet Archive · Independent First Wayback Machine capture; confirms the page existed by this date, not when it was published.
    Open date source
  • Sitemap last modified Apr 8, 2026 · MongoDB · Publisher metadata Publisher-reported modification timestamp; not a publication date.
    Open date source
Not separately sourced Industry, Region, Company size. Treat these normalized attributes as lower-confidence until a dedicated source is added.