NVIDIA Education United States

University of Florida

Enterprise Knowledge Search

The University of Florida wanted a campus-wide AI platform that could serve students, faculty, staff, and researchers with many models and assistants while controlling cost, preserving data privacy, and keeping sensitive academic and research data on premises when needed.

1,500+ unique uses of NaviGator ToolKit
20 LLMs available in NaviGator
52% of ToolKit uses coming from university staff
Nearly 24,000 unique users for NaviGator Chat

Reported impact

Business outcome

UF drove broad adoption with nearly 24,000 unique NaviGator Chat users, more than 1,500 unique ToolKit uses, and 20 available LLMs while creating a cost-predictable, privacy-aware platform that can support tutoring, research, and future agentic campus workflows.

  • Compliance
  • Productivity Improvement
  • Scalability

Solution

UF built NaviGator as a centrally managed, private AI platform on top of its HiPerGator supercomputer so campus users could access a broad catalog of models without each department building its own stack. NVIDIA NIM microservices and Llama NIM serve and scale models such as NVIDIA Nemotron inside NaviGator, giving the university a controlled inference layer that optimizes GPU utilization while preserving on-premises control. HiPerGator remains the core AI factory for private workloads, but the platform is designed as a hybrid service that can also reach AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure when different models or economics make sense. This architecture lets central IT map each task to the right model, keep sensitive student and research data local when necessary, and expose tutors, assistants, and self-service AI tools through one governed platform.

Data flow

Students, faculty, and staff submit prompts or datasets through NaviGator, NIM microservices and Llama NIM serve models such as Nemotron on HiPerGator, the platform keeps sensitive workloads on premises when required, and other jobs can burst to AWS, Google Cloud, or Azure through the same centrally governed service.

Solution architecture

5 components · 2 layers
  1. Compute
    • HiPerGator Acts as the university's on-premises AI factory and supercomputing backbone for private workloads.
  2. Serving
    • NaviGator Provides the self-service multi-model AI platform used by students, faculty, and staff across the university.
    • NVIDIA NIM microservices Supply the managed inference layer used to serve and scale AI models efficiently inside NaviGator.
    • Llama NIM Serves open models on HiPerGator as part of the university's controlled campus AI environment.
    • NVIDIA Nemotron Provides one of the core model families served within NaviGator for campus AI experiences.

Architecture clues

  • NaviGator is centrally managed by UF's IT department rather than by individual colleges.
  • The platform is intentionally hybrid, combining on-premises HiPerGator with AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure.
  • UF uses on-prem-only open models for tasks involving sensitive research data or student PII.

Evidence from the source

For certain tasks, the university can keep data on premises with HiPerGator or use open source models only to ensure privacy, security, and compliance related to sensitive research data or student personally identifiable information (PII).
NaviGator is a true hybrid service that incorporates the on-premises HiPerGator infrastructure with access to AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure.
NaviGator is one of the first self-service, multi-model AI platforms among U.S. higher education institutions.
The key motivations for building NaviGator as a private, in-house platform were cost predictability and data privacy.
The university uses NVIDIA NIM™ microservices and Llama NIM on its HiPerGator supercomputer to efficiently serve and scale AI models like NVIDIA Nemotron™ within NaviGator.
Transparency Evidence & methodology 90/100 reference value · 89% confidence · 1 source

Review how this reference was scored and trace each normalized claim back to its documented source.

01

Scoring methodology

How scores are calculated

Customer Reference Value measures usefulness as a customer reference. Evidence Confidence measures the quality and traceability of available evidence, not independent verification.

Customer reference value90/100
  • Problem clarity20/20
    Measures whether the customer's operational problem is specific enough to compare.
  • Implementation depth25/25
    Rewards named components, data flow, integrations, and architecture detail.
  • Outcome specificity20/20
    Measures whether the reported benefit is concrete rather than a generic claim.
  • Quantified impact15/25
    1 metric describe measurable impact.
  • Deployment scale10/10
    Rewards evidence of a live or scaled deployment and meaningful integration scope.
Evidence confidence89%
  • Source authority20/25
    The main evidence is an official vendor-published customer story.
  • Claim traceability21/25
    10 of 12 key fields link to a named source.
  • Direct evidence20/20
    5 direct source quotes retained.
  • Date provenance10/10
    The publication date comes from the source page or publisher.
  • Source transparency8/10
    1 source reference document publisher, URL, authority, retrieval, and supported fields.
  • Implementation specificity10/10
    Rewards source-backed components, data flow, quantified impact, and a specific outcome.
02

Traceability

Sources & provenance

Field coverage shows which facts each source supports. Dates are shown only when documented by the source.

  1. NVIDIA

    University of Florida customer story

    First-party
    https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/case-studies/university-of-florida/
    Source type
    Vendor-published customer story
    Published
    Apr 16, 2026
    Supports
    • Customer
    • Business problem
    • Solution
    • Products
    • Solution components
    • Data flow
    • Integrations
    • technical area
    • use case category
    • Business outcome
    • outcome category
    • Metrics
    • Architecture
    • evidence quotes
    • Publication date

Date evidence

  • Published on source page Apr 16, 2026 · NVIDIA · First-party
    Open date source
Not separately sourced Industry, Region, Company size. Treat these normalized attributes as lower-confidence until a dedicated source is added.