OpenAI Financial Services global Company newsroom

BBVA

BBVA's Internal Audit teams needed to analyze large volumes of data from multiple sources and heterogeneous formats, design and run increasingly complex analytical tests, verify data quality, document assumptions and decisions, and preserve full traceability without relying on inconsistent spreadsheet work or ad hoc code created by individual auditors.

hundreds of audits globally each year
increase productivity by around 10%

Reported impact

Business outcome

BBVA expects the assistant to make analytics use in audit engagements more consistent, controlled, and scalable, reduce manual and repetitive programming and documentation work, free auditors for higher-value risk assessment and anomaly analysis, and improve audit quality while maintaining traceability and human accountability.

  • Productivity Improvement
  • Risk Reduction
  • Scalability

Solution

BBVA created a purpose-specific assistant within ChatGPT Enterprise for its Internal Audit function to standardize and strengthen large-scale data analysis. Used inside BBVA's controlled corporate environment, the assistant guides auditors through a structured workflow: validating the data initially included in an audit, running quality and consistency checks, helping design specific and complex analytical tests, interpreting the results, and producing reproducible Python or SQL code together with structured analytical explanations for documentation. The implementation is intentionally human-supervised rather than autonomous: auditors review each step, apply professional judgment, and remain responsible for validation and final conclusions. BBVA also applied its governance framework for AI assistants, adding controls for suitable data use, traceability, reproducibility, ongoing monitoring, and periodic review.

Data flow

Internal Audit brings data from multiple internal sources and heterogeneous formats into the assistant-led workflow. Within ChatGPT Enterprise, the assistant helps verify the input data, performs quality and consistency checks, supports the design of analytical tests, interprets outputs, and generates reproducible Python or SQL plus structured explanations. Auditors then review those artifacts, document findings, and make the final conclusions.

Solution architecture

1 components · 1 layer
  1. Uncategorized
    • ChatGPT Enterprise Hosts BBVA's custom audit assistant, which guides data validation, analytical test design, result interpretation, and generation of reproducible code and documentation artifacts for auditors.

Architecture clues

  • Built as a specific GPT within ChatGPT Enterprise.
  • Human oversight is mandatory; auditors retain validation, professional judgment, and final conclusions.
  • Subject to ongoing monitoring and periodic review under BBVA's AI assistant governance framework.
  • Technical controls alert users to the type of data they should use, support quality and traceability, and enable reproducible code generation.
  • Used within BBVA's controlled corporate environment.

Evidence from the source

"Analyzing large volumes of data from multiple sources and in heterogeneous formats."
"At each stage, the system documents the constraints and record counts used, giving auditors full visibility into the analysis performed by the assistant"
"BBVA has created an assistant with ChatGPT Enterprise to support data analysis at Internal Audit, from validating and designing tests to interpreting results."
"It also generates reproducible code in programming languages commonly used in the audit function, such as Python or SQL, as well as structured analytical explanations ready for auditors to use."
"The assistant guides auditors step by step through verifying the data initially included for each audit, performing quality and consistency checks, designing specific and complex analytical tests, and interpreting the results."
"it is expected to help increase productivity by around 10% in each data-driven audit."
Transparency Evidence & methodology 80/100 reference value · 94% confidence · 1 source

Review how this reference was scored and trace each normalized claim back to its documented source.

01

Scoring methodology

How scores are calculated

Customer Reference Value measures usefulness as a customer reference. Evidence Confidence measures the quality and traceability of available evidence, not independent verification.

Customer reference value80/100
  • Problem clarity20/20
    Measures whether the customer's operational problem is specific enough to compare.
  • Implementation depth20/25
    Rewards named components, data flow, integrations, and architecture detail.
  • Outcome specificity20/20
    Measures whether the reported benefit is concrete rather than a generic claim.
  • Quantified impact15/25
    1 metric describe measurable impact.
  • Deployment scale5/10
    Rewards evidence of a live or scaled deployment and meaningful integration scope.
Evidence confidence94%
  • Source authority25/25
    The deployment is described by the adopting organization or a government source.
  • Claim traceability21/25
    10 of 12 key fields link to a named source.
  • Direct evidence20/20
    6 direct source quotes retained.
  • Date provenance10/10
    The publication date comes from the source page or publisher.
  • Source transparency8/10
    1 source reference document publisher, URL, authority, retrieval, and supported fields.
  • Implementation specificity10/10
    Rewards source-backed components, data flow, quantified impact, and a specific outcome.
02

Traceability

Sources & provenance

Field coverage shows which facts each source supports. Dates are shown only when documented by the source.

  1. BBVA

    BBVA customer story

    First-party
    https://www.bbva.com/en/innovation/how-bbva-uses-an-ai-assistant-to-analyze-data-in-internal-audit/
    Source type
    Customer-published story
    Published
    Mar 10, 2026
    Supports
    • Customer
    • Business problem
    • Solution
    • Products
    • Solution components
    • Data flow
    • Integrations
    • technical area
    • use case category
    • Business outcome
    • outcome category
    • Metrics
    • Architecture
    • evidence quotes
    • Publication date

Date evidence

Not separately sourced Industry, Region, Company size. Treat these normalized attributes as lower-confidence until a dedicated source is added.