Snowflake Energy Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Expand Energy

Data Lake / Data Warehouse Modernization · Predictive Maintenance · Real-time Analytics

replace siloed warehouse, Hadoop, and SAP systems that could not combine financial, IoT, and OT data fast enough for self-service analytics, drilling decisions, forecasting, and M&A integration.

1,000+ Minimum estimated hours of labor saved annually
3,700 production sites
40% Less time to complete data-related M&A tasks, resulting in faster integrations
over 1.2 million owners

Reported impact

Business outcome

Expand Energy cut data-related M&A time and cost by 40%, saves more than 1,000 labor hours per year in one business unit, and gives engineers and operators faster self-service insight for forecasting, drilling, safety, and regulatory work.

  • Compliance
  • Cost Reduction
  • Productivity Improvement
  • Risk Reduction

Solution

Expand Energy standardized on Snowflake as the shared platform for business, IoT, and operational data across its shale operations, replacing a fragmented stack of legacy warehouse, HDFS, and SAP HANA systems. Data from business systems, SCADA feeds, well production, equipment telemetry, site details, and M&A source systems is centralized in Snowflake so engineers, finance teams, and field operations can work from a single governed foundation. Snowpark models and cloud-hosted machine learning workflows maintain dynamic well forecasts, while Cortex Analyst adds natural-language analysis over drilling activity and nonproductive time. Continuous Snowflake queries create digital-twin-style monitoring for 3,700 sites and surface anomalies such as corrosion, equipment risk, or downtime for the operations center. The same platform also co-locates data from acquired companies, accelerates cleansing and conversion, and enforces RBAC-based access, auditability, and regulatory reporting.

Data flow

Business systems, SCADA feeds, well production data, equipment age, and site details land in Snowflake. Snowpark models and ML workflows maintain forecasts and drilling datasets, while continuous queries generate digital-twin-style monitoring and alerts for corrosion or downtime risk. Cortex Analyst serves natural-language answers to engineers, and the same governed platform co-locates acquired-company data for finance and accounting integration.

Solution architecture

4 components · 4 layers
  1. Compute
    • Snowpark Supports the data models and machine learning workflows used for well forecasting and real-time drilling analytics.
  2. Storage
    • Snowflake Centralizes financial, operational, IoT, and M&A data and runs the continuous queries that support monitoring and analytics.
  3. Serving
    • Cortex Analyst Lets engineers ask natural-language questions about drilling activity and recent operations directly on Snowflake data.
  4. Governance
    • role-based access control (RBAC) Secures self-service access by aligning Snowflake permissions with data sensitivity, auditability, and regulatory requirements.

Architecture clues

  • Applies DevOps processes and sensitivity-based RBAC to support audits and regulated operations.
  • Combines well production, equipment age, and site details into a digital twin for each site.
  • Uses continuous Snowflake queries to detect issues such as tank corrosion and send alerts to the operations center.

Evidence from the source

40% reduction in costs and time for merger and acquisition activities
Snowflake allows us to integrate comprehensive datasets seamlessly and leverage cloud-hosted machine learning models to maintain dynamic well forecasts
Snowflake reduces the need for specialized teams and uses consistent patterns for IoT, SAP and other data all in one place
The data combines with well production, equipment age and site details, creating a digital twin for each site
over 1,000 hours of labor can be saved annually
Transparency Evidence & methodology 100/100 reference value · 79% confidence · 1 source

Review how this reference was scored and trace each normalized claim back to its documented source.

01

Scoring methodology

How scores are calculated

Customer Reference Value measures usefulness as a customer reference. Evidence Confidence measures the quality and traceability of available evidence, not independent verification.

Customer reference value100/100
  • Problem clarity20/20
    Measures whether the customer's operational problem is specific enough to compare.
  • Implementation depth25/25
    Rewards named components, data flow, integrations, and architecture detail.
  • Outcome specificity20/20
    Measures whether the reported benefit is concrete rather than a generic claim.
  • Quantified impact25/25
    2 metrics describe measurable impact.
  • Deployment scale10/10
    Rewards evidence of a live or scaled deployment and meaningful integration scope.
Evidence confidence79%
  • Source authority20/25
    The main evidence is an official vendor-published customer story.
  • Claim traceability21/25
    10 of 12 key fields link to a named source.
  • Direct evidence20/20
    5 direct source quotes retained.
  • Date provenance0/10
    The publication date has no documented provenance.
  • Source transparency8/10
    1 source reference document publisher, URL, authority, retrieval, and supported fields.
  • Implementation specificity10/10
    Rewards source-backed components, data flow, quantified impact, and a specific outcome.
02

Traceability

Sources & provenance

Field coverage shows which facts each source supports. Dates are shown only when documented by the source.

  1. Snowflake

    Expand Energy customer story

    First-party
    https://www.snowflake.com/en/customers/all-customers/case-study/expand-energy/
    Source type
    Vendor-published customer story
    Supports
    • Customer
    • Business problem
    • Solution
    • Products
    • Solution components
    • Data flow
    • Integrations
    • technical area
    • use case category
    • Business outcome
    • outcome category
    • Metrics
    • Architecture
    • evidence quotes

Date evidence

  • First archived Jul 16, 2025 · Internet Archive · Independent First Wayback Machine capture; confirms the page existed by this date, not when it was published.
    Open date source
  • Sitemap last modified Jul 11, 2026 · Snowflake · Publisher metadata Publisher-reported modification timestamp; not a publication date.
    Open date source
Not separately sourced Industry, Region, Company size. Treat these normalized attributes as lower-confidence until a dedicated source is added.