Wolters Kluwer Healthcare Banten, Indonesia Company newsroom

Mandaya Royal Hospital Puri

Mandaya Royal Hospital Puri needed a generative AI clinical decision support approach that clinicians could trust, after staff were already using unapproved public GenAI tools such as Gemini and ChatGPT that posed hallucination, bias, and governance risks in patient care.

Reported impact

Business outcome

The hospital strengthened clinician decision support with faster access to trusted evidence, reduced dependence on unapproved public GenAI tools, and aimed to improve care quality and patient outcomes while keeping final clinical decisions with physicians.

  • Productivity Improvement
  • Risk Reduction

Solution

Mandaya Royal Hospital Puri implemented UpToDate clinical decision support with UpToDate Expert AI as part of its digitalization strategy for clinician decision-making. In the hospital workflow, clinicians enter natural-language questions at the point of care, and UpToDate Expert AI acts as a generative AI conversational layer over UpToDate’s rigorously reviewed clinical interpretations and evidence-based clinical database. The hospital did not deploy the tool blindly: it appointed clinicians to test the system with patient cases and assess whether responses appropriately summarized medical background, flagged issues to watch, proposed care plans, suggested follow-up questions, and presented answers in a structured, concise format. Transparency was also a gating requirement, so clinicians could inspect the supporting evidence behind recommendations before using them. The resulting deployment is designed to strengthen, not replace, physician judgment while reducing reliance on shadow AI.

Data flow

Clinicians submit natural-language clinical questions into UpToDate Expert AI at the point of care. The AI layer draws on UpToDate’s rigorously reviewed clinical database and interpretations to synthesize structured responses, which clinicians then review alongside supporting evidence before applying the information to diagnosis, treatment, and care planning.

Solution architecture

2 components · 2 layers
  1. Storage
    • UpToDate clinical decision support Provides the expert-vetted clinical interpretations and evidence base that clinicians consult for care decisions.
  2. Serving
    • UpToDate Expert AI Adds a generative AI conversational interface so clinicians can ask natural-language questions and receive context-rich, evidence-grounded answers at the point of care.

Architecture clues

  • Clinicians evaluated the system using test patient cases before rollout.
  • Clinicians use the tool through natural-language prompts in a conversational experience at the point of care.
  • First hospital in Southeast Asia to implement UpToDate Expert AI.
  • Transparency and access to supporting evidence were explicit implementation criteria.
  • UpToDate Expert AI is described as a generative AI-powered layer on top of UpToDate clinical interpretations.

Evidence from the source

"Clinicians can input natural language prompts and receive context-rich responses to each question through a conversational experience."
"If technologies such as AI-powered clinical decision support can help reduce the risk of error and improve the quality of care, then we should embrace that opportunity."
"In 2026, the hospital marked another technological milestone by becoming the first in Indonesia – and in the Southeast Asia region – to adopt UpToDate clinical decision support (CDS) with UpToDate Expert AI, a generative AI-powered layer on top of the rigorously reviewed UpToDate clinical interpretations trusted by 3 million healthcare professionals worldwide."
"Mandaya Royal Hospital Puri – the first hospital in Southeast Asia to implement UpToDate Expert AI – shares how it evaluated and integrated the platform to help strengthen clinician decision-making."
"The hospital appointed several clinicians with assessing each system using test patient cases."
"These platforms come with the risk of errors and hallucinations. In contrast, a dedicated clinical repository like UpToDate Expert AI ensures our clinicians access only expert-vetted information that has met strict governance standards."
Transparency Evidence & methodology 65/100 reference value · 92% confidence · 1 source

Review how this reference was scored and trace each normalized claim back to its documented source.

01

Scoring methodology

How scores are calculated

Customer Reference Value measures usefulness as a customer reference. Evidence Confidence measures the quality and traceability of available evidence, not independent verification.

Customer reference value65/100
  • Problem clarity20/20
    Measures whether the customer's operational problem is specific enough to compare.
  • Implementation depth20/25
    Rewards named components, data flow, integrations, and architecture detail.
  • Outcome specificity20/20
    Measures whether the reported benefit is concrete rather than a generic claim.
  • Quantified impact0/25
    0 metrics describe measurable impact.
  • Deployment scale5/10
    Rewards evidence of a live or scaled deployment and meaningful integration scope.
Evidence confidence92%
  • Source authority25/25
    The deployment is described by the adopting organization or a government source.
  • Claim traceability21/25
    10 of 12 key fields link to a named source.
  • Direct evidence20/20
    6 direct source quotes retained.
  • Date provenance10/10
    The publication date comes from the source page or publisher.
  • Source transparency8/10
    1 source reference document publisher, URL, authority, retrieval, and supported fields.
  • Implementation specificity8/10
    Rewards source-backed components, data flow, quantified impact, and a specific outcome.
02

Traceability

Sources & provenance

Field coverage shows which facts each source supports. Dates are shown only when documented by the source.

  1. Mandaya Royal Hospital Puri

    Mandaya Royal Hospital Puri customer story

    First-party
    https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/expert-insights/indonesian-hospital-accelerates-digitalization-by-leveraging-genai
    Source type
    Customer-published story
    Published
    Aug 26, 2026
    Supports
    • Customer
    • Business problem
    • Solution
    • Products
    • Solution components
    • Data flow
    • Integrations
    • technical area
    • use case category
    • Business outcome
    • outcome category
    • Metrics
    • Architecture
    • evidence quotes
    • Publication date

Date evidence

  • Published on source page Aug 26, 2026 · Wolters Kluwer · First-party
    Open date source
Not separately sourced Industry, Region, Company size. Treat these normalized attributes as lower-confidence until a dedicated source is added.