AWS Public Sector Singapore Company newsroom

National Library Board

Enterprise Knowledge Search

As the National Archives of Singapore prepared to release newly declassified records from The Albatross File, the National Library Board needed to broaden public access to historically important archives without compromising the accuracy, context, and authority required for those records.

100K visitors generating 90,000+ questions through the ChatBook in 5 months
4K bookings before opening

Reported impact

Business outcome

NLB turned a static archival display into an interactive, evidence-grounded public experience that let visitors explore Singapore's independence records through their own questions while preserving trust and archival integrity. The exhibit drew strong public engagement and established a governed model NLB can reuse across future collections.

  • Customer Experience
  • Risk Reduction
  • Scalability

Solution

National Library Board, through the National Archives of Singapore, worked with Accenture to build ChatBook @ The Albatross File on AWS as a governed generative AI archive experience. The implementation began by taking source materials from The Albatross File together with related newspaper articles, oral histories, and video, then standardizing those disparate formats into a structured, searchable knowledge base. That knowledge base was connected to Amazon Bedrock so the application could retrieve only relevant archival evidence when answering visitor questions. Within that controlled workflow, Anthropic foundation models generated natural-language responses bounded by the selected records. Accenture also built the user interface, question interpretation, and evidence-selection logic, plus rules that suppress answers when the archive does not support a clear response. The finished system serves answers instantly on exhibit screens, links each answer back to underlying sources, and provides a reusable model NLB can extend to future archive collections.

Data flow

Materials from The Albatross File, plus related newspaper articles, oral histories, and video, are standardized into a structured knowledge base on AWS. Visitor questions from ChatBook are processed through Amazon Bedrock, which selects relevant archival evidence and invokes Anthropic foundation models within those boundaries. The system returns answers to the exhibit interface with links to the underlying sources and explanations of their relevance.

Solution architecture

4 components · 4 layers
  1. Compute
    • Anthropic foundation models Generate natural-language answers within the Bedrock workflow while staying grounded in verified archive content.
  2. Serving
    • ChatBook @ The Albatross File Serves as the visitor-facing AI chat service and exhibit interface that accepts plain-language questions and displays source-linked answers.
  3. Orchestration
    • Amazon Bedrock Connects the knowledge base to foundation models and constrains responses to relevant archival records.
  4. Uncategorized
    • AWS Provides the cloud environment on which the ChatBook application and its governed archive experience were built.

Architecture clues

  • Each answer links to the underlying archival sources and explains their relevance.
  • Responses are displayed instantly on large screens in the exhibit space.
  • The governed model is designed to extend across future archive collections.
  • The system answers only when a question can be resolved through the archival record.
  • Where evidence is ambiguous or attribution is contested, the system does not interpret.

Evidence from the source

"100K visitors generating 90,000+ questions through the ChatBook in 5 months"
"4K bookings before opening"
"Every answer is grounded in the collection, with Anthropic foundation models operating within those boundaries."
"It answers only when a question can be resolved through the archival record."
"NLB faced a defining choice: how to broaden access without compromising the accuracy and authority those archives must uphold."
"The knowledge base was then connected to Amazon Bedrock, enabling ChatBook to draw only from relevant archival records when addressing visitor questions."
"The team transformed materials from The Albatross File, as well as related newspaper articles, oral histories, and video, into a structured, searchable knowledge base"
Transparency Evidence & methodology 66/100 reference value · 92% confidence · 1 source

Review how this reference was scored and trace each normalized claim back to its documented source.

01

Scoring methodology

How scores are calculated

Customer Reference Value measures usefulness as a customer reference. Evidence Confidence measures the quality and traceability of available evidence, not independent verification.

Customer reference value66/100
  • Problem clarity20/20
    Measures whether the customer's operational problem is specific enough to compare.
  • Implementation depth25/25
    Rewards named components, data flow, integrations, and architecture detail.
  • Outcome specificity16/20
    Measures whether the reported benefit is concrete rather than a generic claim.
  • Quantified impact0/25
    0 metrics describe measurable impact.
  • Deployment scale5/10
    Rewards evidence of a live or scaled deployment and meaningful integration scope.
Evidence confidence92%
  • Source authority25/25
    The deployment is described by the adopting organization or a government source.
  • Claim traceability21/25
    10 of 12 key fields link to a named source.
  • Direct evidence20/20
    7 direct source quotes retained.
  • Date provenance10/10
    The publication date comes from the source page or publisher.
  • Source transparency8/10
    1 source reference document publisher, URL, authority, retrieval, and supported fields.
  • Implementation specificity8/10
    Rewards source-backed components, data flow, quantified impact, and a specific outcome.
02

Traceability

Sources & provenance

Field coverage shows which facts each source supports. Dates are shown only when documented by the source.

  1. National Library Board

    National Library Board customer story

    First-party
    https://www.accenture.com/en/case-studies/ai-data/national-library-board
    Source type
    Customer-published story
    Published
    Sep 29, 2026
    Supports
    • Customer
    • Business problem
    • Solution
    • Products
    • Solution components
    • Data flow
    • Integrations
    • technical area
    • use case category
    • Business outcome
    • outcome category
    • Metrics
    • Architecture
    • evidence quotes
    • Publication date

Date evidence

  • Published on source page Sep 29, 2026 · Accenture · First-party
    Open date source
Not separately sourced Industry, Region, Company size. Treat these normalized attributes as lower-confidence until a dedicated source is added.