In-house Energy Austria Company newsroom

OMV

Enterprise Knowledge Search · Risk Management

OMV needs to reduce uncertainty in complex geothermal and carbon capture and storage decisions, while also making large volumes of structured and unstructured subsurface data easier for geoscientists to find, summarize, and use in day-to-day technical work.

Reported impact

Business outcome

OMV says the AI approach reduces uncertainty, improves safety and risk assessment, lowers field-design and operational costs, speeds project execution, improves information quality, and supports more profitable low-carbon business development.

  • Cost Reduction
  • Productivity Improvement
  • Risk Reduction

Solution

OMV is building two complementary in-house AI capabilities for its low-carbon energy business. For geothermal and carbon capture and storage planning, OMV and Stanford University are creating an AI-driven decision-making tool that ingests subsurface and surface operating data and evaluates field-development choices such as where to drill wells, how many wells to drill, when to inject CO2, hydrogen, or cold water, where to place CO2 injectors, and which monitoring techniques to use. The tool acts as a compute layer for simulation-heavy design and safety decisions, helping reduce uncertainty and field-design effort. In parallel, the OMV Energy Chat Bot is being developed with OMV colleagues in Norway to work over large volumes of structured and unstructured subsurface data. It uses GPT/LLM capabilities with knowledge graphs to summarize, extract, and present technical information to geoscientists, turning buried domain data into faster decision support.

Data flow

OMV feeds structured and unstructured subsurface and surface data into two AI paths. The decision-making tool analyzes reservoir and field-design variables to recommend drilling, injection, injector-placement, and monitoring choices for geothermal and CCS projects. In parallel, the OMV Energy Chat Bot uses GPT/LLM processing over domain data linked through knowledge graphs, then serves summaries, extracted facts, and technical presentations to geoscientists for project execution and decision-making.

Solution architecture

3 components · 3 layers
  1. Compute
    • AI-driven decision-making tool Analyzes geothermal and CCS field-design choices such as drilling, injection timing, injector placement, and monitoring selection to reduce uncertainty and support safer decisions.
  2. Storage
    • knowledge graphs Organize technical knowledge so the chatbot can retrieve and connect domain-specific information for geoscientists.
  3. Serving
    • OMV Energy Chat Bot Provides geoscientists with summarized, extracted, and presented technical information from OMV's subsurface knowledge base.

Architecture clues

  • Decision-support work is being created in collaboration with Stanford University
  • First-party OMV implementation with no external AI vendor named
  • OMV highlights handling sensitive data securely through in-house GenAI expertise
  • OMV's 2030 low-carbon targets are 4 TWh of geothermal energy and 3 million tons of CO2 stored annually
  • The chatbot is being developed together with OMV colleagues in Norway
  • The solution covers geothermal energy and carbon capture and storage use cases

Evidence from the source

"For CCS, it strategically positions CO injectors and selects effective monitoring techniques, ensuring the highest level of long-term safety in CO storage."
"The OMV Energy Chat Bot, which is developed together with our colleagues in Norway, will leverage generative pre-trained transformers (GPTs), LLMs (Large Language Models), and knowledge graphs."
"They lower field design expenses such as simulation and labor costs. They also lower operational expenses related to monitoring, backup wells, and other activities."
"This solution significantly reduces uncertainty, increases profitability, and optimizes low-carbon business development."
"This will allow faster project execution, increased information quality, and better decision making by revealing hidden information."
"To address these challenges, we are collaborating with Stanford University to create an AI-driven decision-making tool."
"We manage a massive volume of unstructured and structured subsurface and surface data which contains valuable hidden insights, but retrieving it historically required substantial manual effort."
Transparency Evidence & methodology 70/100 reference value · 95% confidence · 2 sources

Review how this reference was scored and trace each normalized claim back to its documented source.

01

Scoring methodology

How scores are calculated

Customer Reference Value measures usefulness as a customer reference. Evidence Confidence measures the quality and traceability of available evidence, not independent verification.

Customer reference value70/100
  • Problem clarity20/20
    Measures whether the customer's operational problem is specific enough to compare.
  • Implementation depth25/25
    Rewards named components, data flow, integrations, and architecture detail.
  • Outcome specificity20/20
    Measures whether the reported benefit is concrete rather than a generic claim.
  • Quantified impact0/25
    0 metrics describe measurable impact.
  • Deployment scale5/10
    Rewards evidence of a live or scaled deployment and meaningful integration scope.
Evidence confidence95%
  • Source authority25/25
    The deployment is described by the adopting organization or a government source.
  • Claim traceability23/25
    11 of 12 key fields link to a named source.
  • Direct evidence20/20
    7 direct source quotes retained.
  • Date provenance10/10
    The publication date comes from the source page or publisher.
  • Source transparency9/10
    2 source references document publisher, URL, authority, retrieval, and supported fields.
  • Implementation specificity8/10
    Rewards source-backed components, data flow, quantified impact, and a specific outcome.
02

Traceability

Sources & provenance

Field coverage shows which facts each source supports. Dates are shown only when documented by the source.

  1. OMV

    OMV customer story

    First-party
    https://www.omv.com/en/magazine/insights/2024/from-geothermal-to-css-how-ai-is-powering-our-journey-to-net-zero
    Source type
    Customer-published story
    Published
    Oct 17, 2024
    Supports
    • Customer
    • Business problem
    • Solution
    • Products
    • Solution components
    • Data flow
    • Integrations
    • technical area
    • use case category
    • Business outcome
    • outcome category
    • Metrics
    • Architecture
    • evidence quotes
    • Publication date
  2. OMV

    OMV Company

    First-party
    https://www.omv.com/en/company

    The Organization JSON-LD on the page lists addressLocality Vienna and addressCountry AT.

    Source type
    official company website
    Supports
    • Region

Date evidence

Not separately sourced Industry, Company size. Treat these normalized attributes as lower-confidence until a dedicated source is added.