In-houseHealthcareRisk ManagementAI and Machine LearningProductivity ImprovementRisk ReductionSpeed to Market2024In-houseIN#0f766eHealthcareFranceDrug development is long, resource-intensive, and uncertain, and Sanofi needed a better way to assess safety, efficacy, and competitive differentiation of drug candidates before advancing them into later clinical phases.90% failure rate of new drug candidates during clinical developmentMay 22, 20245Risk Management02024-05-225
Drug development is long, resource-intensive, and uncertain, and Sanofi needed a better way to assess safety, efficacy, and competitive differentiation of drug candidates before advancing them into later clinical phases.
↗90% failure rate of new drug candidates during clinical development
↗scale and accelerate research processes from a matter of weeks to just hours
Reported impact
Business outcome
Sanofi says virtual patients enable faster first assessments of safety and efficacy, better accuracy, potential reductions in the number of trial patients needed, evidence generation for hard-to-recruit subtypes, and research cycles that can shrink from weeks to hours.
Productivity Improvement
Risk Reduction
Speed to Market
Solution
Sanofi describes an in-house AI-based digital twinning approach for early drug development using virtual patient populations. The implementation starts by ingesting available clinical trial data from live patients together with disease biology, pathophysiology, and known pharmacology data. These inputs are combined in a single computational framework built with quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) modeling and AI models. Within that framework, Sanofi generates digital twins of human patients, simulates an investigational compound's mechanism of action on disease pathways, and measures predicted effects on clinical endpoints such as cytokines, lung function, and exacerbations. The virtual patient computer platform is then used to run blind predictions against Phase 1b trial results, compare candidate performance with existing therapies, and support R&D teams in deciding whether to move compounds into the next clinical phase.
Data flow
Sanofi combines clinical trial data from live patients with disease biology, pathophysiology, and known pharmacology in a single QSP-based computational framework. That framework generates virtual patients, simulates a compound's mechanism of action on disease pathways, and produces predicted clinical effects that R&D teams compare with observed Phase 1b results and other therapies before advancing development.
Solution architecture
0 products mentioned
Architecture clues
A single computational framework integrates disease biology, pathophysiology, known pharmacology, and live-patient clinical trial data.
Sanofi uses quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) disease modeling to build digital twins and virtual patient populations.
Sanofi validated the model with a blind prediction against a Phase 1b proof-of-mechanism trial.
The asthma implementation modeled relevant cell types and proteins to provide a multi-scale disease view.
Virtual patient populations have already been built for multiple therapeutic indications.
Evidence from the source
"Drug development is long, resource-intensive and marked by uncertainty at every turn."
"In this 'blind' model prediction, the model's results were a good match to the data observed in the Phase 1b study."
"Once this framework is in place, we can simulate an investigational compound's mechanism of action (MOA) in digital patients to understand how that compound might work on known disease pathways or drivers."
"Our teams can scale and accelerate research processes from a matter of weeks to just hours"
"Through digital trials, we can conduct faster first assessments of the safety and efficacy of drug candidates with better accuracy, and potentially even reduce the number of patients needed in clinical trials."
"Using what is called quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) modeling of a disease and available clinical trial data from live patients, we can create digital twins of the human patients seen in the clinic."
"When generating the virtual patients, we take all of the available data on disease biology, pathophysiology, and known pharmacology, and integrate it into a single computational framework."
Review how this reference was scored and trace each normalized claim back to its documented source.
01
Scoring methodology
How scores are calculated
Customer Reference Value measures usefulness as a customer reference. Evidence Confidence measures the quality and traceability of available evidence, not independent verification.
Customer reference value80/100
Problem clarity20/20
Measures whether the customer's operational problem is specific enough to compare.
Implementation depth15/25
Rewards named components, data flow, integrations, and architecture detail.
Outcome specificity20/20
Measures whether the reported benefit is concrete rather than a generic claim.
Quantified impact15/25
1 metric describe measurable impact.
Deployment scale10/10
Rewards evidence of a live or scaled deployment and meaningful integration scope.
Evidence confidence93%
Source authority25/25
The deployment is described by the adopting organization or a government source.
Claim traceability23/25
11 of 12 key fields link to a named source.
Direct evidence20/20
7 direct source quotes retained.
Date provenance10/10
The publication date comes from the source page or publisher.
With your OK, we use Google Analytics cookies to see which pages and searches are useful. No ads, no profiling, and
nothing is loaded until you accept. You can change this any time under “Cookie settings” in the footer.