NVIDIA Education United States

Harvard Medical School

The Walter Lab at Harvard Medical School needed to map protein-protein interactions at proteome scale to study DNA repair and disease mechanisms, but manual structural biology work and false-positive model predictions made the project too slow and too large for traditional computing resources.

1.7 million protein interaction predictions in three months
32-node DGX clusters with 256 A100 GPUs
40,000 high-confidence protein-protein interactions

Reported impact

Business outcome

The Walter Lab produced nearly 1.7 million protein interaction predictions in three months, generated 40,000 high-confidence interactions among 300 genome-maintenance proteins, and created a practical path to broader structural interactome research that would otherwise have taken years or longer.

  • Productivity Improvement
  • Scalability
  • Speed to Market

Solution

Harvard Medical School's Walter Lab built a multi-step AI pipeline for protein interaction discovery and scaled it on NVIDIA DGX Cloud. The workflow first uses a machine-learning tool called KIRC to identify protein pairs that merit deeper analysis, then applies a second model, the Structure Predictions and Omics-Informed Classifier (SPOC), to separate true and false protein-protein interaction predictions. To execute the structure-prediction stage at massive scale, the team ran ColabFold on the full NVIDIA DGX Cloud stack, using 32-node DGX clusters with 256 A100 GPUs obtained through the NAIRR pilot. This dedicated cloud environment gave the lab enough configurable GPU capacity to move from tens of thousands of predictions to 1.7 million PPI runs in three months, turning an otherwise years-long discovery process into a tractable research workflow.

Data flow

KIRC first narrows the candidate protein pairs, SPOC filters the resulting predictions, ColabFold runs large-scale structure prediction on DGX Cloud A100 clusters, and the resulting interaction map feeds the lab's structural interactome and downstream disease-research hypotheses.

Solution architecture

5 components · 2 layers
  1. Compute
    • KIRC Selects protein pairs that are worth deeper structural analysis.
    • Structure Predictions and Omics-Informed Classifier (SPOC) Filters predicted interactions by separating true and false protein-protein interaction candidates.
    • NVIDIA DGX Cloud Provides the configurable large-scale GPU environment used to run the lab's end-to-end protein AI workflow.
    • NVIDIA A100 GPUs Supply the 256-GPU accelerated cluster capacity that made proteome-scale inference practical.
  2. Serving
    • ColabFold Executes the large-scale protein interaction predictions inside the DGX Cloud deployment.

Architecture clues

  • DGX Cloud was provisioned through the NAIRR pilot as a dedicated cloud resource the team could configure for its own use.
  • The project uses ColabFold rather than a purely manual structural biology process for the main prediction stage.
  • The workflow separates candidate-pair selection, false-positive classification, and large-scale structure prediction into distinct stages.

Evidence from the source

The Walter Lab conquered these limitations by developing a multi-step pipeline.
The researchers created a machine learning tool named KIRC, which identifies protein pairs that are worth in-depth analysis by AlphaFold.
The team adopted NVIDIA Accelerated Computing infrastructure and the full NVIDIA DGX Cloud stack—consisting of 32-node DGX clusters with 256 A100 GPUs.
The team then designed a second machine learning tool known as the Structure Predictions and Omics-Informed Classifier (SPOC), which is capable of separating true and false predictions of PPIs.
This NVIDIA solution allowed researchers to run 1.7 million PPI predictions on ColabFold in the span of three months.
Transparency Evidence & methodology 86/100 reference value · 89% confidence · 1 source

Review how this reference was scored and trace each normalized claim back to its documented source.

01

Scoring methodology

How scores are calculated

Customer Reference Value measures usefulness as a customer reference. Evidence Confidence measures the quality and traceability of available evidence, not independent verification.

Customer reference value86/100
  • Problem clarity20/20
    Measures whether the customer's operational problem is specific enough to compare.
  • Implementation depth25/25
    Rewards named components, data flow, integrations, and architecture detail.
  • Outcome specificity16/20
    Measures whether the reported benefit is concrete rather than a generic claim.
  • Quantified impact15/25
    1 metric describe measurable impact.
  • Deployment scale10/10
    Rewards evidence of a live or scaled deployment and meaningful integration scope.
Evidence confidence89%
  • Source authority20/25
    The main evidence is an official vendor-published customer story.
  • Claim traceability21/25
    10 of 12 key fields link to a named source.
  • Direct evidence20/20
    5 direct source quotes retained.
  • Date provenance10/10
    The publication date comes from the source page or publisher.
  • Source transparency8/10
    1 source reference document publisher, URL, authority, retrieval, and supported fields.
  • Implementation specificity10/10
    Rewards source-backed components, data flow, quantified impact, and a specific outcome.
02

Traceability

Sources & provenance

Field coverage shows which facts each source supports. Dates are shown only when documented by the source.

  1. NVIDIA

    Harvard Medical School customer story

    First-party
    https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/case-studies/harvard-medical-school/
    Source type
    Vendor-published customer story
    Published
    Jan 30, 2026
    Supports
    • Customer
    • Business problem
    • Solution
    • Products
    • Solution components
    • Data flow
    • Integrations
    • technical area
    • use case category
    • Business outcome
    • outcome category
    • Metrics
    • Architecture
    • evidence quotes
    • Publication date

Date evidence

  • Published on source page Jan 30, 2026 · NVIDIA · First-party
    Open date source
Not separately sourced Industry, Region, Company size. Treat these normalized attributes as lower-confidence until a dedicated source is added.