NVIDIA Education United States

The Ohio State University

The Ohio State University needed enough compute and data-engineering capacity to assemble a global biodiversity dataset and train a foundation model that could identify species across nearly a million taxa, which was impractical on smaller research infrastructure.

1.36 million noisy taxonomic hierarchies
18.0% average improvement in species classification accuracy over BioCLIP
214 million images
32 NVIDIA H100 GPUs for 10 days

Reported impact

Business outcome

BioCLIP 2 delivered best or top-two species-identification performance across almost one million taxa, improved average species-classification accuracy by 18 percent over BioCLIP, and gave conservation researchers a scalable foundation model trained on the largest biodiversity dataset assembled to date.

  • Productivity Improvement
  • Scalability
  • Speed to Market

Solution

Ohio State researchers built BioCLIP 2 around a pipeline that starts with TreeOfLife-200M, a 214 million-image biodiversity corpus assembled from sources including GBIF, Encyclopedia of Life, BIOSCAN-5M, and FathomNet. TaxonoPy standardizes noisy taxonomic hierarchies and distributed download tools place the curated data on HPC file systems, where GPU clusters can keep training fed at scale. The team then trains and evaluates BioCLIP 2 across a mix of NVIDIA A100 and H100 systems, from NAIRR allocations at the Ohio and Pittsburgh supercomputing centers to a 32-H100 primary run for the final model. That architecture gives the researchers a repeatable way to ingest massive ecological datasets, learn species representations across almost one million taxa, and then run recognition and zero-shot identification workloads that outperform prior biodiversity models.

Data flow

Images and taxonomy data from major biodiversity repositories are normalized with TaxonoPy and stored in TreeOfLife-200M. Training jobs then stream the curated corpus onto A100 and H100 GPU clusters, which produce the BioCLIP 2 model used for large-scale species classification and zero-shot ecological recognition.

Solution architecture

4 components · 3 layers
  1. Compute
    • NVIDIA A100 GPUs Provide large-batch training capacity for dataset curation experiments and full model training runs.
    • NVIDIA H100 GPUs Accelerate the primary BioCLIP 2 training and ablation runs at production scale.
  2. Storage
    • TreeOfLife-200M Serves as the large-scale biodiversity dataset that feeds BioCLIP 2 training and evaluation.
  3. Orchestration
    • TaxonoPy Standardizes noisy taxonomic hierarchies so disparate biodiversity data sources can be trained as one corpus.

Architecture clues

  • Ablation studies ran on TreeOfLife-10M using 8 H100 GPUs
  • Distributed-downloader tools and HPC file systems feed the training pipeline
  • The model targets species identification and zero-shot recognition across almost one million taxa
  • The project was supported through the NAIRR pilot program

Evidence from the source

18.0% average improvement in species classification accuracy over BioCLIP
As part of the US National Science Foundation National AI Research Resource (NAIRR) pilot program, the team used a combined allocation at the Ohio Supercomputer Center and the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center, running 64 NVIDIA A100 GPUs for 290 hours.
The primary training run for the final BioCLIP 2 model was conducted on 32 NVIDIA H100 GPUs for 10 days.
Trained on the world's largest biology dataset, comprising 214 million images, using NVIDIA GPUs.
Transparency Evidence & methodology 100/100 reference value · 89% confidence · 1 source

Review how this reference was scored and trace each normalized claim back to its documented source.

01

Scoring methodology

How scores are calculated

Customer Reference Value measures usefulness as a customer reference. Evidence Confidence measures the quality and traceability of available evidence, not independent verification.

Customer reference value100/100
  • Problem clarity20/20
    Measures whether the customer's operational problem is specific enough to compare.
  • Implementation depth25/25
    Rewards named components, data flow, integrations, and architecture detail.
  • Outcome specificity20/20
    Measures whether the reported benefit is concrete rather than a generic claim.
  • Quantified impact25/25
    3 metrics describe measurable impact.
  • Deployment scale10/10
    Rewards evidence of a live or scaled deployment and meaningful integration scope.
Evidence confidence89%
  • Source authority20/25
    The main evidence is an official vendor-published customer story.
  • Claim traceability21/25
    10 of 12 key fields link to a named source.
  • Direct evidence20/20
    4 direct source quotes retained.
  • Date provenance10/10
    The publication date comes from the source page or publisher.
  • Source transparency8/10
    1 source reference document publisher, URL, authority, retrieval, and supported fields.
  • Implementation specificity10/10
    Rewards source-backed components, data flow, quantified impact, and a specific outcome.
02

Traceability

Sources & provenance

Field coverage shows which facts each source supports. Dates are shown only when documented by the source.

  1. NVIDIA

    The Ohio State University customer story

    First-party
    https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/case-studies/ohio-state-ai-bioclip2-conservation-biodiversity/
    Source type
    Vendor-published customer story
    Published
    Mar 31, 2026
    Supports
    • Customer
    • Business problem
    • Solution
    • Products
    • Solution components
    • Data flow
    • Integrations
    • technical area
    • use case category
    • Business outcome
    • outcome category
    • Metrics
    • Architecture
    • evidence quotes
    • Publication date

Date evidence

  • Published on source page Mar 31, 2026 · NVIDIA · First-party
    Open date source
Not separately sourced Industry, Region, Company size. Treat these normalized attributes as lower-confidence until a dedicated source is added.