OpenAI Healthcare US

Lifespan

Document Processing

Lifespan needed to make surgical consent forms easier for patients to understand because the documents were still written at a college reading level and could undermine health literacy during emotionally difficult care decisions.

approximately a 6th grade reading level with a 25 percent reduction in word count
over half of Americans reading at or below the 6th grade level
reduced from three pages to one page

Reported impact

Business outcome

Lifespan made consent forms more accessible for patients, reduced document length and complexity, and created a repeatable AI-assisted workflow for simplifying other forms across the health system.

  • Customer Experience
  • Productivity Improvement

Solution

Lifespan built a tightly governed document-simplification workflow around GPT-4 to rewrite surgical consent forms into plain language without changing meaning. Medical residents first identified that consent forms remained too complex for many patients, then used a simple prompt to ask GPT-4 to preserve content while rewriting the text to the average American reading level. The model produced an initial draft at roughly a sixth-grade reading level, after which legal and medical reviewers checked the output to mitigate hallucination and bias before deployment. That human-in-the-loop flow let Lifespan move from dense three-page documents toward simpler one-page forms, then extend the same process to other clinical paperwork such as intake and chemotherapy consent forms. The result is an implementation that keeps AI as the first-pass drafting layer while clinicians and legal staff remain the final authority on what reaches patients.

Data flow

Lifespan feeds an existing surgical consent form and a simplification prompt into GPT-4, receives a plain-language draft, routes that draft through legal and medical review, and then deploys the approved version across the health system as patient-facing documentation.

Solution architecture

1 components · 1 layer
  1. Compute
    • GPT-4 Creates the first simplified draft of surgical consent forms while preserving their original meaning.

Architecture clues

  • GPT-4 is used only for a first pass and not final publication
  • Legal and medical reviewers check outputs for bias and hallucination
  • The same process is being extended to intake and chemotherapy consent forms

Evidence from the source

GPT-4 generated a draft of the surgical consent form at approximately a 6th grade reading level with a 25 percent reduction in word count
In September 2023, Lifespan began deploying the revised surgical consent forms, reduced from three pages to one page
Lifespan has now replicated this GPT-4 assisted process to deploy simplified medical documentation across its healthcare system
Lifespan leadership created a system where GPT-4 would do a first pass, and then legal and medical reviewers would check the output
Transparency Evidence & methodology 90/100 reference value · 92% confidence · 2 sources

Review how this reference was scored and trace each normalized claim back to its documented source.

01

Scoring methodology

How scores are calculated

Customer Reference Value measures usefulness as a customer reference. Evidence Confidence measures the quality and traceability of available evidence, not independent verification.

Customer reference value90/100
  • Problem clarity20/20
    Measures whether the customer's operational problem is specific enough to compare.
  • Implementation depth25/25
    Rewards named components, data flow, integrations, and architecture detail.
  • Outcome specificity20/20
    Measures whether the reported benefit is concrete rather than a generic claim.
  • Quantified impact15/25
    1 metric describe measurable impact.
  • Deployment scale10/10
    Rewards evidence of a live or scaled deployment and meaningful integration scope.
Evidence confidence92%
  • Source authority20/25
    The main evidence is an official vendor-published customer story.
  • Claim traceability23/25
    11 of 12 key fields link to a named source.
  • Direct evidence20/20
    4 direct source quotes retained.
  • Date provenance10/10
    The publication date comes from the source page or publisher.
  • Source transparency9/10
    2 source references document publisher, URL, authority, retrieval, and supported fields.
  • Implementation specificity10/10
    Rewards source-backed components, data flow, quantified impact, and a specific outcome.
02

Traceability

Sources & provenance

Field coverage shows which facts each source supports. Dates are shown only when documented by the source.

  1. OpenAI

    Lifespan customer story

    First-party
    https://openai.com/index/lifespan/
    Source type
    Vendor-published customer story
    Published
    Mar 18, 2024
    Supports
    • Customer
    • Business problem
    • Solution
    • Products
    • Solution components
    • Data flow
    • Integrations
    • technical area
    • use case category
    • Business outcome
    • outcome category
    • Metrics
    • Architecture
    • evidence quotes
    • Publication date
  2. Brown University Health

    Brown University Health Facts & Statistics | Brown University Health

    First-party
    https://www.brownhealth.org/about/facts-statistics

    The page says "Statistics are from fiscal year 2025" and "Employees: 19,469".

    Source type
    Official facts page
    Supports
    • Company size

Date evidence

  • Published on source page Mar 18, 2024 · OpenAI · First-party
    Open date source
Not separately sourced Industry, Region. Treat these normalized attributes as lower-confidence until a dedicated source is added.